Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Brooks v Easther (No 3) [2017] TASSC 54 — Prerogative Writs And Orders — Barrister AI

Brooks v Easther (No 3)

[2017] TASSC 54

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Administrative Law
2. › Prerogative writs and orders
3. › Prohibition
4. › Generally
5. › Statutory Board of Inquiry
6. › Natural justice obligations
7. › Whether bias or apprehended bias
8. › Whether denial of procedural fairness.
1. Local Government Act 1993 (Tas), s 218(1)(c).
1. Aust Dig Administrative Law [1228]

Case Details

Citation[2017] TASSC 54

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2017Brooks v EastherTASFC 12
2017Brooks v Easther (No 4)TASSC 59

Relies on11

2016Branch-Allen v EastherTASSC 29
2011Reece v WebberFCAFC 33
2006Antoun v RHCA 2
2003Applicant NAHF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous AffairsFCA 140
and 7 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works