Tasmania v Farhat [2017] TASSC 66 — Evidence & Evidence Act 2001 (Tas), Ss 135, 137. — Barrister AI
← Back
Tasmania v Farhat
[2017] TASSC 66
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+8 more
Criminal Law
›
Evidence
›
Judicial discretion to admit or exclude evidence
›
Prejudicial evidence
›
Generally
›
Voice identification evidence.
Evidence Act 2001 (Tas), ss 135, 137.
Aust Dig Criminal Law [2680]
Criminal Law
›
Evidence
›
Identification evidence
›
Modes of identification
›
Voice identification
›
Admissibility of voice identification as evidence of fact, expert opinion or lay opinion.
Case Details
Citation
[2017] TASSC 66
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] TASSC 66
17 authorities it relies on
1987
1993
1999
2005
2011
2017
Relies on
17
2016
Tran & Chang v The Queen
VSCA 79
2016
IMM v The Queen
HCA 14
2015
Miller v R
NSWCCA 206
2014
Kheir v The Queen
VSCA 200
and 13 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
