Muscle Car Factory & Anor v Puleo [2017] VCC 1854 — Security For Costs & Interlocutory Proceeding — Barrister AI
← Back
Muscle Car Factory & Anor v Puleo
[2017] VCC 1854
County Court of Victoria
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Costs
›
SECURITY FOR COSTS
›
FACTORS RELEVANT TO EXERCISE OF DISCRETION
›
where vacation of trial date on application of plaintiffs
›
whether order should be made for payment of security for costs estimated to be thrown away
›
where no application for security for costs made prior to hearing
›
security for costs not ordered
Costs
›
INTERLOCUTORY PROCEEDING
›
TAXATION
›
where interlocutory costs not taxable until the conclusion of the proceeding unless the Court otherwise orders
›
Rule 63A.20.1 of the County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2008 (Vic)
›
where application for immediate taxation of order for costs thrown away by reason of vacation of trial date
›
immediate taxation not ordered
Case Details
Citation
[2017] VCC 1854
Court
VCC
Jurisdiction
Victoria
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] VCC 1854
14 authorities it relies on
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2017
Relies on
14
2017
Von Marburg v Aldred & Anor (No 3)
VSC 146
2017
Hewitt v Count Financial Ltd
VSCA 354
2016
Trkulja v Dobrijevic (No 2)
VSC 596
2013
Setka v Abbott & Anor (No 2)
VSCA 376
and 10 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
