Where an applicant's impecuniosity is inextricably bound up with the conduct of the respondent, this constitutes a special circumstance justifying a stay of execution pending appeal and warrants refusal of security for costs, even where the evidence of impecuniosity is unsatisfactory in form. An offer by the respondent to hold the judgment sum in trust does not necessarily defeat the stay application in such circumstances.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 9 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.