This is a consequential orders judgment with minimal precedential value. The substantive legal analysis was contained in the earlier decision at [2016] VSCA 322. The judgment illustrates that an appellate court will not set aside trial orders that were not pressed on appeal, and that the existence of interlocutory relief in separate proceedings may affect the practical consequences of appellate orders.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.