A headline phrase such as 'creative accounting' used as a pithy encapsulation of conduct described in the body of an article is not capable of conveying to the ordinary reasonable reader an imputation of financial impropriety where the article, read as a whole, explains the phrase by reference to non-financial conduct. The case confirms that imputations requiring the reader to engage in unreasonable and speculative inference upon inference will not survive summary judgment.
The full text is available to signed-in members.