da Horta v Podiatry Board of Australia [No 2] [2017] WASC 264 — Registered Health Practitioner — Barrister AI
← Back
da Horta v Podiatry Board of Australia [No 2]
[2017] WASC 264
Supreme Court of Western Australia
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Judicial review - Registered health practitioner - Decision to caution - Reasonable belief that conduct is or may be unsatisfactory - Whether manifestly unreasonable - Turns on own facts
Case Details
Citation
[2017] WASC 264
Court
WASC
Jurisdiction
Western Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2017] WASC 264
12 authorities it relies on
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2017
Relies on
12
2015
Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
HCA 50
2015
Solomon v Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency
WASC 203
2014
Coppa v Medical Board of Australia
NTSC 48
2013
Bernadt v Medical Board of Australia
WASCA 259
and 8 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
