A total sentence of 3 years' imprisonment with an 18-month non-parole period for fraud offences totalling approximately $157,609 committed by a trusted employee over four years was upheld as within the available sentencing discretion, notwithstanding a pattern of more lenient sentences in comparable ACT cases. There is no principle that white collar offenders should serve a shorter proportion of their sentence in custody than other offenders. The moral culpability for using a false document may be assessed by reference to the circumstances of the falsification rather than the net financial gain.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.