Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Salcedo; R v Stretton (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 104 — Evidence & Criminal Law — Barrister AI

R v Salcedo; R v Stretton (No 2)

[2018] ACTSC 104

Supreme Court of the ACT23 April 2018

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › Confessions and Admissions
4. › Admissibility - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 23V - Failure to record questioning when practicable to do so
5. › Contrary to the interests of justice to admit such evidence
6. › Whether admission made whilst accused was ‘being questioned’
1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE - Judicial Discretion to admit or exclude Evidence
3. › Relevance
4. › Evidence Act 2011 (ACT), s 137 - Possession of firearm said to have been used in crime
5. › Whether evidence of possession of items admissible
6. › Unfair prejudice of admitting firearms

Case Details

Citation[2018] ACTSC 104

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date23 April 2018

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

2 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by4

2025D'Agostino v RNSWCCA 159
2024DPP v Okwechime (No 2)ACTSC 34
2019Carson (a Pseudonym) v The QueenVSCA 317
2019R v HinderACTSC 26

Relies on8

2016IMM v The QueenHCA 14
2014Murrell v The QueenVSCA 334
2009R v JfACTSC 104
2004Kelly v RHCA 12
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works