R v Eastman (No 36) [2018] ACTSC 107 — Criminal Law & Evidence — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Eastman (No 36)
[2018] ACTSC 107
Supreme Court of the ACT
2 May 2018
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Criminal Law
Evidence
Admissibility of evidence contained in notices filed by the defence pursuant s 67 relying on s 65(8) of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
evidence that does not substantially affect a witness’ credit is inadmissible pursuant to s 103(1) of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
Case Details
Citation
[2018] ACTSC 107
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
2 May 2018
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] ACTSC 107
1 authority it relies on
2018
Relies on
1
2018
R v Eastman (No 32)
ACTSC 12
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
