R v Eastman (No 41) [2018] ACTSC 175 — Criminal Law & Evidence — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Eastman (No 41)
[2018] ACTSC 175
Supreme Court of the ACT
14 June 2018
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+1 more
Criminal Law
Evidence
Admissibility of evidence pursuant to s 43 of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT) as evidence of a prior inconsistent statement of witness
inconsistency in the evidence affected its probative value
Case Details
Citation
[2018] ACTSC 175
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
14 June 2018
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] ACTSC 175
5 authorities it relies on
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
Relies on
5
2017
R v Brooks (No 3)
NSWSC 261
2014
Clay v The Queen
VSCA 269
2011
Singh v The Queen
VSCA 263
2010
Regina v XY
NSWCCA 181
and 1 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
