Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Johnson [2018] ACTSC 242 — Admissibility & Warrentless Search — Barrister AI

R v Johnson

[2018] ACTSC 242

Supreme Court of the ACT31 August 2018

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
2. › ADMISSIBILITY
3. › section 138 of Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
4. › whether evidence obtained in consequence of a contravention of an Australian law
5. › whether evidence obtained in contravention of an Australian law
6. › whether discretion should be exercised
1. Police and Emergency Services
2. › WARRENTLESS SEARCH
3. › section 190 of Crimes Act 1900 (ACT)
4. › whether there is imminent danger of injury
5. › whether a person has suffered physical injury
6. › whether it is necessary to enter the premises immediately
1. Criminal Law
2. › SEARCH WARRANTS
3. › warrant issued via telephone
4. › sections 185, 194 and 205 of Crimes Act 1900 (ACT)
5. › warrant issued when the issuing officer is outside of the ACT
6. › whether warrant was validly issued

Case Details

Citation[2018] ACTSC 242

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date31 August 2018

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by4

2025Chol v HughesACTSC 547
2023Glavinic v CommonwealthACTSC 361
2021Tran v StapletonACTSC 1
2018R v PeterACTSC 312

Relies on13

2018Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border ProtectionHCA 34
2018McElroy v The Queen; Wallace v The QueenVSCA 126
2017Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Limited (No.2)NSWSC 733
2017State of New South Wales v BoufflerNSWCA 185
and 9 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works