Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Lockwood [2018] ACTSC 26 — Evidence — Barrister AI

R v Lockwood

[2018] ACTSC 26

Supreme Court of the ACT23 February 2018

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › Evidentiary matters relating to witnesses and accused persons
4. › pre-trial application
5. › identification evidence
6. › whether not reasonable to have held an identification parade
7. › whether probative value is significantly outweighed by unfair prejudice
1. Evidence
2. › JUDICIAL DISCRETION TO ADMIT OR EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
3. › Visual identification evidence
4. › use of Facebook profile photograph to identify the accused
5. › not reasonable to have held an identification parade
6. › probative value not outweighed by unfair prejudice
7. › evidence of the identification of the accused by reference to his Facebook page not excluded

Case Details

Citation[2018] ACTSC 26

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date23 February 2018

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2017R v O'BrienNTSC 34

Relies on5

2016Bayley v The QueenVSCA 160
2016IMM v The QueenHCA 14
2014Peterson (a Pseudonym) v The QueenVSCA 111
2014R v Smith (No.3)NSWSC 771
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works