R v Eastman (No 47) [2018] ACTSC 263 — Evidence & Parties: — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Eastman (No 47)
[2018] ACTSC 263
Supreme Court of the ACT
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
Evidence
›
Admissibility of parts of evidence given by accused at a previous trial
Parties:
David Harold Eastman (Accused)
Case Details
Citation
[2018] ACTSC 263
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] ACTSC 263
1 authority it relies on
2017
2018
Relies on
1
2017
R v Eastman (No 15)
ACTSC 143
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
