R v Kisun (No 3) [2018] ACTSC 370 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Kisun (No 3)
[2018] ACTSC 370
Supreme Court of the ACT
23 August 2018
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
›
subpoena
›
s 31 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth)
›
service in New Zealand
›
evidence of witness would be significant for tendency purposes and providing context to the complaint evidence
›
evidence could not be obtained by other means without significantly greater expense and inconvenience to the persons named
Criminal Law
›
JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
›
taking of evidence by audio-visual link from New Zealand
›
s 50 of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth)
›
evidence more conveniently taken from New Zealand
Case Details
Citation
[2018] ACTSC 370
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
23 August 2018
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] ACTSC 370
1 authority it relies on
2018
Relies on
1
2018
R v Kisun (No 2)
ACTSC 85
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
