R v Alas (No 3) [2018] ACTSC 38 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Alas (No 3)
[2018] ACTSC 38
Supreme Court of the ACT
7 February 2018
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
›
Judgment and punishment
›
sentencing
›
sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 16 years
long-term relationship between offender and victim
›
substantial age difference
›
subjective circumstances
›
mental health condition
›
post-traumatic stress disorder
›
sentencing patterns at the time of the offending
›
general deterrence
›
prisoner at risk
›
sentenced to a period of imprisonment
Case Details
Citation
[2018] ACTSC 38
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
7 February 2018
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] ACTSC 38
6 authorities it relies on
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Relies on
6
2017
R v Al-Harazi (No 7)
ACTSC 350
2017
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym)
HCA 41
2016
The Queen v Kilic
HCA 48
2016
Millard v The Queen
ACTCA 14
and 2 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works