Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Levick v Attorney-General [2018] FCA 1609 — Privilege — Barrister AI

Levick v Attorney-General

[2018] FCA 1609

Federal Court of Australia

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Privilege
1. whether respondent waived legal professional privilege over redacted portions of documents served upon applicant
1. held: applicant has not established wavier of legal professional privilege
1. interlocutory application dismissed with costs

Case Details

Citation[2018] FCA 1609

CourtFCA

JurisdictionCommonwealth

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2025Rivas v Minister for Finance (Privilege Issue)FCA 138

Relies on5

2013Honourable Brendan O'Connor v AdamasFCAFC 14
2008Osland v Secretary to the Department of JusticeHCA 37
2006NSW Council for Civil Liberties Inc v Classification Review Board (No. 1)FCA 1409
2006Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto LimitedFCAFC 86
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works