Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Wakeley & Wakeley [2018] FCCA 3707 — Family Law & Property — Barrister AI

Wakeley & Wakeley

[2018] FCCA 3707

Federal Circuit Court of Australia

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Family Law
1. Property
1. where each party seeks orders for property distribution after the breakdown of their marriage
1. where the parties previously entered into property adjustment orders by consent in 1998

Case Details

Citation[2018] FCCA 3707

CourtFCCA

JurisdictionCommonwealth

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Relies on8

2014In the matter of Colorado Products Pty Ltd (in prov liq)NSWSC 789
2012Stanford v StanfordHCA 52
2012Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Brown; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Gillfillan; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Koffel; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Terry; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v O'Brien; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Willcox; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ShafronHCA 17
2011Celermajer Holdings Pty Ltd v KopasNSWSC 40
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works