The Court held that a party seeking to re-agitate a dismissed interlocutory application must demonstrate a change of circumstances or new evidence not available at the original hearing; the mere interlocutory character of the order does not entitle a party to unlimited re-litigation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.