A general reference to a body of religious law (such as Halacha) in a contract governed by Australian law is insufficient to incorporate specific principles of that law as contractual terms; the subject matter must be sufficiently described to enable identification and ascertainment of the relevant rules, and a contract of indefinite duration without express termination provisions is terminable on reasonable notice notwithstanding religious law principles to the contrary.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.