A court making vexatious proceedings orders under the VP Act must individually identify and assess each proceeding alleged to be vexatious against the s 6 definition before determining frequency under s 8(1)(a); a generalised finding of vexatiousness is insufficient. Under s 8(1)(b), a person acting in concert with a frequent vexatious litigant need not themselves satisfy any frequency requirement.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 30 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 30 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.