A jury may rationally convict on one count of sexual intercourse while acquitting on other counts of the same offence where the convicted count alone is corroborated by specific forensic evidence (here, DNA on a used condom). The availability of scientific corroboration for one count but not others provides a logical and reasonable basis for differentiation under the MacKenzie test.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.