Where co-offenders are charged with different offences arising from the same criminal enterprise, the parity principle does not require that the difference in sentences be limited to a narrow margin; the difference in legislative guideposts (maximum penalties and standard non-parole periods) and the relative roles of the offenders may justify a substantial disparity. Courts should be cautious before finding a justifiable sense of grievance where the same judge sentenced both co-offenders.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.