PRACTICE & PROCEDURE — whether plaintiffs have provided acceptable proof of due interstate service of originating process according to the requirements of the Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 and UCPR r 10 — whether pre-conditional jurisdictional requirements of s 47(1) of the District Court Act 1973 are satisfied — defendants’ motion to set aside service, or alternatively, to strike out plaintiffs’ proceedings as an abuse of process — plaintiffs’ motion seeking confirmation of claim of due service
