DP v Rigby & Ors [2018] NTSC 11 — Appeal & Sentencing Act 1995 (NT) S 52(3), 78C — Barrister AI
← Back
DP v Rigby & Ors
[2018] NTSC 11
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+4 more
Appeal and New Trial
›
Appeal
›
General principles
›
Admission of fresh evidence
›
Whether leave should be granted for adducing fresh evidence
›
Reasonable explanation for failure to adduce fresh evidence
›
Evidence adduced in the court below
›
Leave granted
›
Local Court (Criminal Procedure) Act (NT) s 176A
Appeal and New Trial
›
Appeal
›
General principles
›
In general and right of appeal
›
Appeal against sentence
›
Misunderstanding of salient feature of evidence
›
Principles and factors to be taken into account in relation to young offenders
›
Failure to attribute adequate weight to rehabilitation
›
Youth being dealt with by a court for the first time
›
Appeal allowed
Appeal and New Trial
›
Appeal
›
Error in imposing aggregate sentences
›
Youth Justice Act 2005 (NT) s 125
›
Appeal allowed
Local Court (Criminal Procedure) Act (NT) s 176A
Case Details
Citation
[2018] NTSC 11
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] NTSC 11
1 authority it relies on
2009
2011
2013
2015
2018
Relies on
1
2009
Woods v Eaton
NTSC 49
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works