› Admission Board referred the question of the applicant’s fitness to the Court for decision
› suitability matters
› academic dishonesty
› failure to initially disclose details of academic dishonesty
› credibility of applicant
› applicant established that he is a fit and proper person.
Legal Profession Act, s 4(2), s 11, s 11(1)(ga), s 25(2)(a)(1), s 25(2)(b), s 29, s 32(1).
In the matter of an application by [name withheld] [2014] NTSC 30, Re Deo (2005) NTLR 102, Re Sutton [2016] NTSC 9, Wentworth v New South Wales Bar Association [1992] HCA 24; [1992] 176 CLR 239, referred to.
[name withheld], Disclosure of Prior Student Academic Misconduct in Admission to Legal Practice QULTJ Volume 8 No 2 Page 314.
Case Details
Citation[2018] NTSC 26
CourtNTSC
JurisdictionNorthern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
