Post-offence harassment conduct characterised by extreme sexual jealousy — including obsessive monitoring of a complainant's interactions with males, accusations of sexual promiscuity, and admitted voyeurism — is admissible under the Pfennig test to prove ongoing sexual interest in the complainant where, viewed in the context of the prosecution case, there is no reasonable view of the evidence consistent with innocence. The fact that the conduct occurred after the cessation of alleged sexual offending and involved no attempted sexual contact does not preclude admissibility where the complainant's evidence is that the offending ceased only because she was able to rebuff the accused's advances.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.