Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Re Cresswell [2018] QSC 142 — Definition And Classification — Barrister AI

Re Cresswell

[2018] QSC 142

Supreme Court of Queensland

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Personal Property
2. › DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION
3. › OTHER CASES
4. › whether the sperm removed is property capable of being possessed
1. Personal Property
2. › OWNERSHIP AND POSSESSION
3. › POSSESSION
4. › RIGHTS OF POSSESSION
5. › whether the applicant has an entitlement to possession and use of the sperm removed
6. › if such an entitlement exists, whether discretionary factors favour the making of the declarations sought
1. Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) s 236
1. Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth) s 8, s 11

Case Details

Citation[2018] QSC 142

CourtQSC

JurisdictionQueensland

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by5

2021In the matter of an Application by Adams (a pseudonym) (No 2)NSWSC 794
2020Noone v Genea LimitedNSWSC 1860
2020In the matter of an Application by VernonNSWSC 608
2018Chapman v South Eastern Sydney Local Health DistrictNSWSC 1231
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on27

2018GLS v Russell-WeiszWASC 79
2013Re Section 22 of the Human Tissue and Transplant ACT 1982 (WA); Ex Parte CWASC 3
2012Re H, Ae (No 2)SASC 177
2011Floyd, ReQSC 218
and 23 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works