Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Mericka v Return to Work SA [2018] SAET 104 — Corporation & Application — Barrister AI

Mericka v Return to Work SA

[2018] SAET 104

South Australian Employment Tribunal

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Claim that signatures on redemption agreement were
1. forged and that worker had been made vulnerable by conduct of the WorkCover
1. Corporation
1. Held: Evidence of worker not accepted
2. › Application

Case Details

Citation[2018] SAET 104

CourtSAET

JurisdictionSouth Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on7

2000Hillier & Carney v Lucas No. SCGRG-94-694SASC 331
1997Maguire & Tansey v MakaronisHCA 23
1995Alati v KrugerHCA 64
1995Vadasz v Pioneer Concrete (SA) Pty LtdHCA 14
and 3 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works