Mericka v Return to Work SA (Formerly WorkCover Corporation); ex parte FNE Lawyers [2018] SAET 145 — Worker Received Adverse Costs — Barrister AI
← Back
Mericka v Return to Work SA (Formerly WorkCover Corporation); ex parte FNE Lawyers
[2018] SAET 145
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+15 more
Worker received adverse costs
order at second trial
›
worker’s solicitors had ceased to act at the
beginning of the first
trial and sought to recover costs and disbursements from
Case Details
Citation
[2018] SAET 145
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] SAET 145
1 authority it relies on
1994
1999
2004
2009
2014
2018
Relies on
1
1994
Cachia v Hanes
HCA 14
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
