Richards v Little Company of Mary Health Care [2018] SAET 186 — Self-represented & Litigant — Barrister AI
← Back
Richards v Little Company of Mary Health Care
[2018] SAET 186
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+5 more
Appeal
›
Self-represented
litigant
›
Appellant alleges that the Deputy President failed in his duty
to her as a self-represented
litigant
›
Authorities on duty to
Case Details
Citation
[2018] SAET 186
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] SAET 186
23 authorities it relies on
1981
1988
1995
2002
2009
2018
Relies on
23
2016
SZVCP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
FCAFC 24
2013
SZRUR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
FCAFC 146
2011
Hamod v State of New South Wales and Anor
NSWCA 375
2009
Kenny v Ritter
SASC 139
and 19 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
