Benjamin Backhouse v Return to Work SA [2018] SAET 40 — Worker Located In Remote & Had Just — Barrister AI
← Back
Benjamin Backhouse v Return to Work SA
[2018] SAET 40
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+13 more
sustained by worker whilst playing cricket occurred in compensable circumstances
Worker located in remote
site (Prominent Hill)
›
Had just
completed 7 days of night shift
›
He had 24 hours off between the end of
Case Details
Citation
[2018] SAET 40
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] SAET 40
5 authorities it relies on
1931
1948
1965
1982
1999
2018
Relies on
5
2013
Comcare v PVYW
HCA 41
1996
DAVID JOHN PEET v WORKERS REHABILITATION and COMPENSATION CORPORATION No. SCGRG 95/1590 Judgment No. 5757 Number of pages - 11 Workers' compensation (1996) 66 SASR 474
SASC 5757
1969
Danvers v Commissioner for Railways (NSW)
HCA 64
1931
Whittingham v Commissioner of Railways (WA)
HCA 49
and 1 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
