In child protection appeals, where an order of the Youth Court is set aside for error but the proper placement of the child remains genuinely and reasonably contestable, the matter should generally be remitted to the Youth Court rather than determined on appeal. However, remittal requires the appellant to adduce sufficient evidence — including concluded expert psychiatric or psychological opinion — to establish a reasonable case for a different outcome. The institutional expertise of the Youth Court in child placement matters is to be given significant weight. The Court left open the possibility that the Youth Court might entertain a future application to vary or revoke the permanent guardianship order where evidence of the child's time with the biological parent has not been judicially considered.
The full text is available to signed-in members.