Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Moore v Salter [2018] TASSC 18 — Orders And Convictions — Barrister AI

Moore v Salter

[2018] TASSC 18

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Magistrates
2. › Orders and convictions
3. › Sentence
4. › Other miscellaneous orders
5. › Suspended sentence of imprisonment
6. › Whether "unjust" to activate suspended sentence
7. › Respondent breached the terms of suspension on numerous occasions by committing a variety of offences over a period of approximately six months and showed a flagrant disregard for the terms of the suspended sentence
8. › Magistrate erred by concluding it was unjust to activate the suspended sentence
9. › Suspended sentence activated.
1. Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas), s27.
1. Justices Act 1959 (Tas), s 110(2A), (2AA) and (2AB).
1. Cannell v Hughes [2014] TASSC 41, followed.

Case Details

Citation[2018] TASSC 18

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on10

2014Cannell v HughesTASSC 41
2011Simon-Brown v RichardsonTASSC 62
2011Tanner v BrownTASSC 59
2003Harper v GaudenTASSC 66
and 6 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works