Szabo v Moore [2018] TASSC 31 — Appeal And Review & Aust Dig Magistrates [1348] — Barrister AI
← Back
Szabo v Moore
[2018] TASSC 31
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Magistrates
›
Appeal and review
›
Motion to review
›
Tasmania
›
Procedure and evidence
›
Matters relating to decision - Reasons for decision
›
Duty to state reasons
›
Magistrate's failure to resolve factual basis for determination
›
rational inference consistent with innocence open on facts.
Aust Dig Magistrates [1348]
Magistrates
›
Appeal and review
›
Motion to review
›
Tasmania
›
Procedure and evidence
›
Procedural errors made by magistrate
›
No apprehension of bias
›
Procedural errors did not lead to a miscarriage of justice.
Aust Dig Magistrates [1348]
Case Details
Citation
[2018] TASSC 31
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] TASSC 31
30 authorities it relies on
1936
1952
1968
1984
2000
2018
Relies on
30
2017
Langley v Lyons
TASSC 48
2015
Denney v Lusted
TASSC 10
2013
Ta v Thompson & Anor
VSCA 344
2011
FB v Regina; Regina v FB
NSWCCA 217
and 26 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works