Roberts v Redpath Haulage Pty Ltd [2018] TASSC 33 — Appeal And Review & Aust Dig Magistrates [1345] — Barrister AI
← Back
Roberts v Redpath Haulage Pty Ltd
[2018] TASSC 33
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Magistrates
›
Appeal and review
›
Tasmania
›
Motion to review
›
Appeal against sentence
›
Crown alleged sentence is manifestly inadequate
›
Magistrate sentenced for breach of the Heavy Vehicle National Law
›
Magistrate erred in exercise of sentencing discretion
›
Magistrate failed to take into account relevant considerations
›
Sentence manifestly inadequate.
Aust Dig Magistrates [1345]
Case Details
Citation
[2018] TASSC 33
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2018] TASSC 33
3 authorities it relies on
1936
1952
1968
1984
2000
2018
Relies on
3
2004
Her Majesty's Attorney-General v O
TASSC 53
2003
Prehn v R
TASSC 55
1936
House v R
HCA 40
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
