The Court of Appeal refused a renewed application for leave to appeal against a sentence of 3 years' imprisonment (with a 15-month non-parole period) for grooming a child under 16 for sexual conduct, holding that it was not reasonably arguable that the sentence was manifestly excessive. The Court endorsed the single judge's reasons without further elaboration.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.