A jury is not required to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that a witness was mistaken in identifying someone other than the accused on a photoboard before it can convict the accused on the basis of other circumstantial evidence. The absence of a positive identification by one witness does not preclude conviction where the totality of the circumstantial evidence supports the only reasonable inference of guilt. A jury question about the meaning of 'reasonable doubt' does not, without more, support an inference that the jury applied an incorrect standard of proof, particularly where the trial judge gave a clear and emphatic corrective direction.
The full text is available to signed-in members.