R v Cn (No 2)

[2019] ACTSC 171

Supreme Court of the ACT26 June 2019

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Evidence
2. › HEARSAY
3. › When the maker was unavailable
4. › Whether the intended asserted fact has probative value
5. › Whether the evidence is unfairly prejudicial
1. Evidence
2. › TAKING OF EVIDENCE
3. › Application for witnesses to give evidence by audiovisual link from a participating State
4. › Whether it is convenient for the witness
5. › Whether it causes unfairness to the accused
1. Evidence
2. › TENDENCY EVIDENCE
3. › Cross-admissibility of evidence of each charged acts
4. › Whether the evidence supports a general or a particular tendency
5. › Application of The Queen v Bauer [2018] HCA 40
1. Evidence
2. › TENDENCY EVIDENCE
3. › Whether evidence of the accused’s browser history has significant probative value
4. › Whether the evidence supports the asserted tendency of having a sexual interest in young females
5. › Whether the evidence is unfairly prejudicial

Citation[2019] ACTSC 171

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date26 June 2019

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in