Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Ezekiel-Hart v Reis (Leave to Appeal) [2019] ACTSC 193 — Appeal & Discrimination — Barrister AI

Ezekiel-Hart v Reis (Leave to Appeal)

[2019] ACTSC 193

Supreme Court of the ACT25 July 2019

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › Application for leave to appeal from ACAT
3. › whether ground of substance to be argued
4. › where the applicant failed to identify questions of law or fact in issue
5. › application for leave dismissed
1. Discrimination
2. › Whether the circumstances surrounding the decision not to grant a practicing certificate to the applicant were in breach of the Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT)
3. › where the applicant failed to provide evidence to substantiate the claim

Case Details

Citation[2019] ACTSC 193

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date25 July 2019

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by5

2025Ezekiel-Hart v Council of the Law Society of ACT (Vexatious Proceedings Order)FCA 551
2024Council of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory v Ezekiel-Hart, in the matter of Ezekiel-HartFCA 1341
2024Ezekiel-Hart v The Council of the Law Society of the ACT (No 7)ACTSC 12
2022Ezekiel-Hart v Council of the Law Society of the ACT (No 2)ACTSC 29
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on6

2019Bailey v BottrillACTSC 45
2015Wsol v John James Memorial HospitalACTSC 378
2014Wiser v Havelock Housing Association IncACTSC 138
2014Francis Pires v DibbsBarker Canberra Pty LimitedACTSC 283
and 2 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works