ACT v Gillan; Gillan v ACT

[2019] ACTSC 200

Supreme Court of the ACT2 August 2019

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Procedure
1. Costs
1. plaintiff’s claim of medical negligence by defendant based on defendant’s failure to offer alternative treatments for ruptured Achilles tendon
1. Calderbank offer by plaintiff in Magistrates Court rejected

Citation[2019] ACTSC 200

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date2 August 2019

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in