Cruz v Director-General of the Justice and Community Safety Directorate [2019] ACTSC 291 — Practice And Procedure & Judicial Review — Barrister AI
← Back
Cruz v Director-General of the Justice and Community Safety Directorate
[2019] ACTSC 291
Supreme Court of the ACT
18 October 2019
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Practice and Procedure
›
Application in Proceeding to strike-out Originating Application for Judicial Review
›
failure to identify a “decision” capable of review
›
Originating Application struck-out
›
no identifiable cause of action
Judicial Review
›
Plaintiff seeking review of contents of pre-release reports relied upon by the Parole Board and the Director-General
›
where the plaintiff claims the ACT Corrective Services Homes Visits Assessment Policy was not complied with when preparing the reports
›
whether the Policy is a legislative instrument
›
Policy determined not to be a legislative instrument
Case Details
Citation
[2019] ACTSC 291
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
18 October 2019
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2019] ACTSC 291
6 authorities it relies on
1965
1976
1987
1998
2009
2019
Relies on
6
2018
Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
HCA 34
2010
Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission; Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Childs)
HCA 1
2005
Griffith University v Tang
HCA 7
1979
Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs
FCA 39
and 2 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works