Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Ts v Dt [2019] ACTSC 295 — Evidence — Barrister AI

Ts v Dt

[2019] ACTSC 295

Supreme Court of the ACT25 October 2019

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › Whether evidence of previous convictions relied-upon by the Magistrate should have been excluded
4. › whether an application for leave to appeal out of time is an “instituted” appeal or review
5. › where the Court was on notice as to the existence of the application
6. › application of ss 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
7. › Magistrate erred in taking account of convictions
8. › error did not lead to miscarriage of justice

Case Details

Citation[2019] ACTSC 295

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date25 October 2019

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by5

2025Ts v DtACTSC 215
2022Chelsey (a pseudonym) v Goodwin (a pseudonym) (No 2)ACTSC 364
2022Ts v DtACTSC 137
2020Ts v DtACTCA 43
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on9

2018Greenwood v BarleeACTSC 46
2017CP v Director-General of Community Services Directorate and OrsACTSC 394
2011CM v TM and AnorACTSC 53
2010Peverill v CramptonACTSC 79
and 5 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works