TW v Director-General of the Justice and Community Safety Directorate [2019] ACTSC 300 — Practice And Procedure & Judicial Review — Barrister AI
← Back
TW v Director-General of the Justice and Community Safety Directorate
[2019] ACTSC 300
Supreme Court of the ACT
30 October 2019
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Practice and Procedure
›
Application in Proceeding to strike-out Originating Application for Judicial Review
›
failure to identify an error
›
no identifiable cause of action
›
Originating Application struck-out
Judicial Review
›
Plaintiff seeks review of Static 99 Tally Sheet completed as part of parole determination process
›
whether the Tally Sheet was erroneously completed
›
whether a different version of the Tally Sheet should have been used
›
whether the interpretation of the Coding Manual used to complete the Tally Sheet was erroneous
›
no factual error found
›
no error in Corrective Services using the Static 99 Tally Sheet
›
no error in the interpretation of the Coding Manual
Case Details
Citation
[2019] ACTSC 300
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
30 October 2019
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2019] ACTSC 300
6 authorities it relies on
2003
2006
2009
2012
2015
2019
Relies on
6
2019
Hoyle v Director-General Corrective Services
ACTSC 226
2013
Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak
HCA 43
2011
R v Tw
ACTCA 25
2007
The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Sukkar
NSWCA 341
and 2 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
