R v Ep

[2019] ACTSC 89

Supreme Court of the ACT

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › application for leave to cross-examine the complainant on prior sexual activities
4. › operation of s 51(2) of the Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1991 (ACT)
5. › whether leave required
1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › admissibility of covert audio recordings
4. › whether the recordings were unlawfully obtained
5. › whether the complainant had objectively reasonable grounds for considering the recording to be necessary for the protection of her then existing lawful interests
6. › recordings not unlawfully obtained pursuant to s 4(3)(b)(i) of the Listening Devices Act 1992 (ACT)

Citation[2019] ACTSC 89

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in