R v Green (No 3)

[2019] ACTSC 96

Supreme Court of the ACT14 March 2019

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › application for directed verdict
4. › whether defect in the evidence was present
5. › absence of evidence of element of the offence
6. › application granted
1. Statutes
2. › Interpretation
3. › word and phrases
4. › s 28 Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) - meaning of the words “choke”, “strangle” and “suffocate”
5. › whether the offence requires the victim to have stopped breathing

Citation[2019] ACTSC 96

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date14 March 2019

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.

2 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in