Where the Migration Act conditions the grant or refusal of a visa upon the Minister's satisfaction as to criteria, the proper basis for challenging an allegedly erroneous factual finding is the non-existence of a subjective jurisdictional fact — permitting more searching review than unreasonableness as a jurisdictional error — and the two forms of review must be kept distinct.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 77 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 77 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.