The existence of a reasonably arguable non-infringement defence is a strong factor against additional damages under s 122(1A), and courts must consider all enumerated factors in the subsection, not just flagrancy alone.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 9 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.