Onley v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police; Menon v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police; Anquetil v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Proceeds of crime
  3. › Examination orders
  4. › Stay of proceedings
  5. › Concurrent criminal proceedings
  6. › Systemic prejudice versus disclosure prejudice
  7. › Whether systemic prejudice alone sufficient to warrant stay
  8. › Balancing exercise under s 319
  9. › Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 180, 266A, 319
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Proceeds of crime
  3. › Examination orders
  4. › Revocation of ex parte orders
  5. › Whether power exists under POC Act to revoke examination orders
  6. › Whether state procedural rules apply to set aside ex parte orders
  7. › Onus of proof
  8. › Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 42, 180, 317
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Proceeds of crime
  3. › Sworn asset statements
  4. › Scope of order under s 39(1)(ca)
  5. › Whether order extends to property of companies of which person is director
  6. › Extended definition of 'interest' in property
  7. › Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 39(1)(ca), 338
• 1. Constitutional Law (Cth)
  2. › Federal jurisdiction
  3. › Application of state laws
  4. › Whether state procedural rules governing setting aside of ex parte orders apply to Commonwealth statutory scheme
  5. › Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), ss 79, 80
  6. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.16

Quick Take