Practitioners challenging conditions of project approvals should note that where conditions are expressed 'to the satisfaction of' a decision-maker and involve evaluative judgments, they are unlikely to be treated as objective jurisdictional facts; the standard of review will be legal unreasonableness, which requires showing the decision-maker's view was not even fairly arguable.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 25 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 25 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.